The Silent Erosion: Is AI Making Us Dumber?

AI is quietly reducing our ability to think critically and solve problems. As we rely on automation for more tasks, we risk losing the very skills that make us unique and capable.

A Subtle Threat Beyond Displacement

Amidst the relentless hype cycle of job displacement and supercharged productivity, a more insidious threat is emerging from the rise of artificial intelligence: the De-Skilling of our workforce. While we have been fixated on the fear of robots taking our jobs, we have overlooked the more subtle danger of AI quietly eroding our cognitive abilities.

This is not about a dystopian future where machines make all the decisions; it is about a present-day reality where our over-reliance on AI is making us less capable, less critical, and ultimately, less human.

The Ancient Fear of Skill Loss

The concern is not new. As Kwame Anthony Appiah, a professor of philosophy and law at New York University, notes in a recent article for The Atlantic, the fear of technology-induced De-Skilling is as old as technology itself. In ancient times, Socrates worried that the invention of writing would atrophy our capacity for memory.

In the 20th century, the calculator was seen as a threat to our mathematical abilities. But the cognitive tasks that AI is now poised to automate, such as legal analysis, market research, and even creative writing, are of a different order entirely.​

The Danger of Passive Consumption

At Project Flux, we believe engaging with AI is essential. If we use it as a tool to augment our own abilities, it can be incredibly powerful. However, if we rely on it as a crutch, we risk a gradual yet significant decline in our own skills. The danger is not in the technology itself, but in our unthinking and passive consumption of it.

As digital solutions continue to weave themselves into the daily fabric of project work, a new question quietly arises: at what cost do we accept the allure of convenience over the rigour of earned expertise?

The rise of AI has undoubtedly improved efficiency and allowed teams to deliver at pace, but many now recognise there is an underlying risk that seldom commands attention. Skills once painstakingly acquired through repeated effort can begin to wane as people lean more and more on automation to fill the gaps in their knowledge and execution.

The threat of De-Skilling is not just theoretical. Recent workplace research highlights that employees in heavily automated environments often feel detached from their role’s core purpose, losing sight of the bigger picture.

Organisations which become too reliant on automated systems sometimes find themselves struggling when those systems change, revealing how shallow true expertise has become in the workforce. Worse still, task automation may cause teams to lose flexibility, as processes start to feel less like creative endeavours and more like assembly lines driven by external instructions. It is in this context that the value of human judgement, adaptability and reflection becomes all the more vital.

“If we do not retrain ourselves to do things better and actually use AI as a way of improving what we do, we run the risk of detaching ourselves.” This warning, shared in recent thought leadership, demonstrates how the most progressive teams do not abandon the fundamentals of real learning and thinking, even if AI is part of their daily toolset.

Another concern to consider is the overlooked satisfaction that comes from truly mastering one’s craft. When AI is only brought in to enhance the final product, workers are able to retain pride and skill in the journey, not just the end result. Project professionals should see the creative process as essential to development, not merely as a checkbox to be expedited.

It is no surprise that industry leaders now advocate for workflows where AI aids but does not dominate, and where each member of a team understands the underlying logic and purpose of decisions that technology enables. Documenting the rationale behind choices, rather than blindly following the output of a model, ensures teams continue to learn and grow. This approach future-proofs organisations against the loss of unique expertise and supports the kind of blended learning that is proven to strengthen both project outcomes and employee satisfaction.

Furthermore, a number of recent studies urge managers and team leads in project delivery to resist the temptation to hire for minimal skills and instead double down on upskilling, critical thinking and collaborative reflection. By investing in these areas, organisations do more than shield themselves from the negative side effect of AI adoption, they also create a more engaged and dynamic workforce, ready to drive long-term value.

“There is so much value in the journey of creating, whether that is a report, or a piece of music, or a film. If we just run straight to the end point, we are in danger of losing that.” In the context of project delivery, this means prioritising not just completion, but the lasting growth and engagement of everyone involved.**

The Journey is the Destination

Consider the process of writing a report, a thesis, or even a piece of music. The value is not just in the final product, but in the journey of creation. It’s in the struggle to articulate a complex idea, the discipline of building an argument step-by-step, the satisfaction of finding the right word or the perfect note.

As Kwame Anthony Appiah, a professor of philosophy and law at New York University, warns, “Kids who turn to Gemini to summarize Twelfth Night may never learn to wrestle with Shakespeare on their own. Aspiring lawyers who use Harvey AI for legal analysis may fail to develop the interpretive muscle their predecessors took for granted.”​

This is the crux of the de-skilling argument. When we outsource our thinking to AI, we are not just saving time; we are also forfeiting an opportunity to learn, to grow, and to develop our own cognitive muscles. A study cited in Springer found a potential 75% reduction in critical thinking skills when individuals become overly dependent on AI. Younger users, in particular, are at risk, with many acknowledging a heavy reliance on AI for tasks related to memory and decision-making.​

“The better the system performs, the less people have to stay sharp, and the less prepared they are for the rare moments when performance fails.” - Kwame Anthony Appiah​

This creates a dangerous feedback loop. The more we rely on AI, the less capable we become, and the more we need to rely on AI. This is the path to what Appiah calls a “gradual attenuation of our character: shallower conversation, a reduced appetite for ambiguity, a drift toward automatic phrasing where once we would have searched for the right word, the quiet substitution of fluency for understanding.”​

A Call for Conscious AI Engagement

So, what is the solution? The answer is not to reject AI, but to engage with it more consciously and deliberately. As the Project Flux team suggests, we need to reframe our relationship with this technology. Instead of using AI to create the first draft, perhaps we should utilise our own human effort for the initial creation and then leverage AI to refine, improve, and challenge our work. This approach preserves the value of the creative journey while still leveraging the power of the technology.

For project managers, this has profound implications for how we train and develop our teams. We need to move beyond simply teaching people how to use AI tools and start teaching them how to think critically with AI tools. This includes:

• Promoting a culture of active inquiry: Encouraging team members to question the outputs of AI models, to understand their limitations, and to never accept them at face value.

  
  

• Prioritising human-in-the-loop workflows: Designing processes that ensure human oversight, judgment, and creativity are at the heart of every decision.

• Investing in uniquely human skills: Focusing training and development on the skills that AI cannot replicate: critical thinking, emotional intelligence, creativity, and complex problem-solving.

The Path Forward

The de-skilling of the workforce is not an inevitable consequence of AI. It is a choice. We can choose to be passive consumers of this technology, or we can choose to be active and engaged partners. We can choose to let our skills atrophy, or we can choose to use AI as a catalyst for our own growth and development.

The future of work will not be a battle between humans and machines, but a partnership. The most successful individuals and organisations will be those who can strike the right balance, harnessing the power of AI without sacrificing the unique and irreplaceable value of human ingenuity.

Don’t let your skills become a casualty of the AI revolution. Subscribe to Project Flux and learn how to thrive in the age of intelligent machines.